Re: Do we better tolerate obstructed updates?

On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 10:02:58PM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> The bindings tests are currently failing, and there appear to be two
> root causes. One of them, causing test failures in both JavaHL and
> swig-rb, is that the tests expect an error with an operation that used
> to cause an obstruction, such as update, but those errors are no
> longer being returned. Has something changed recently which allows us
> to better tolerate obstructions?

Probably r959735?
See notes/tree-conflicts/all-add-vs-add-tree-conflicts.txt for details.

Stefan
Received on 2010-07-07 10:45:24 CEST