Re: Do SHA1 pristines need a wc format bump?

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 14:21, Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> writes:
>
>> If in-db props are needed for pristine, then I don't think swapping
>> their format numbers makes sense.
>
> No, in-db-props are not needed for pristine.

Oh! For some reason, I thought it did.

If you're ready to go, then by all means...

I've got some coding time this weekend to do the upgrade tests, and
then next week I'm home. So you can quick do it, or see where I am by
Monday. There may be an argument for just doing both as part of format
17. The in-db props exposure is limited, as I mentioned.

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2010-06-25 20:32:22 CEST