Philip Martin wrote on Tue, 15 Jun 2010 at 11:16 -0000:
> Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:
> > Putting the get, pre hook and set into a transaction would allow the
> > action in the hook to accurately reflect the change made (or not made
> > if the transaction fails).
>
> We don't need a new transaction to fix this, we can rev the
> svn_fs_change_rev_prop interface instead:
>
> svn_error_t *
> svn_fs_change_rev_prop(svn_fs_t *fs,
> svn_revnum_t rev,
> const char *name,
> const svn_string_t *value,
> apr_pool_t *pool);
>
> to include the current value of the revprop, and then reject the
> change if the current value does not match. That should be simple
> because the FSFS implementation already takes a write lock and the BDB
> implementation already uses a transaction.
>
Testing a patch for this ^.
Daniel
> Then the repos layer can loop (in practice only if the
> use_pre_revprop_change_hook flag is set):
>
> do
> svn_fs_revision_prop(¤t_value)
> action = ...
> svn_repos__hooks_pre_revprop_change(action)
> error = svn_fs_change_rev_prop2(current_value, new_value)
> while error is current value doesn't match
>
> This doesn't alter the fact that the revprop can change at any time
> during the loop but that doesn't matter. The revprop is unversioned
> so only the current state matters and the above will guarantee that
> the current state when the change is made is equal to the state
> validated by the pre-revprop-change hook.
>
>
Received on 2010-06-16 00:18:45 CEST