[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r950445 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: libsvn_repos/repos.c libsvn_subr/io.c

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 22:14:59 +0200

On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 09:49:16PM +0200, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Shouldn't we copy the target of the link instead of duplicating the link?
> That is how I interpreted hot*copy*: creating a backup copy independent of the original. (maybe unix admins think differently about this?)

Either behaviour is desirable depending on circumstance.
I think we need a command line option to put the user in control.

Received on 2010-06-02 22:15:41 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.