Re: svn commit: r948108 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/workqueue.c
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 18:50 +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
> Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:
> > If the working file
> > contents are not equal to the pristine contents then the timestamps
> > should not be equal.
> That might not be clear, I'll try again: if the working file contents
> are not equal to the the pristine contents then the working file
> timestamp should not be stored. Some other timestamp, or no timestamp
> at all, should be stored.
Thanks, Philip. I have reverted it in r948379, as I discovered that the
reason I originally made that "simplification" was to avoid using
svn_wc__text_base_path() when compiled with SVN_EXPERIMENTAL_PRISTINE,
but I had already solved that problem in r947744.
Received on 2010-05-26 11:50:52 CEST
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev