Should we include any update about the trademark transfers?
Greg Stein wrote:
> Hi all,
> Here is the Board report that I filed for this month (as the ASF VP of
> fyi: we're required to keep the Board apprised of all relevant
> activities for their review/oversight. this is part of the legal
> umbrella the ASF provides for our community.
> If you have any questions/concerns/comments, then please let me know!
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: <gstein_at_apache.org>
> Date: Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:35
> Subject: board: r22897 - /foundation/board/board_agenda_2010_05_19.txt
> To: board-cvs_at_apache.org
> Author: gstein
> Date: Mon May 17 14:35:51 2010
> New Revision: 22897
> Add Subversion report.
> Modified: foundation/board/board_agenda_2010_05_19.txt
> --- foundation/board/board_agenda_2010_05_19.txt [utf-8] (original)
> +++ foundation/board/board_agenda_2010_05_19.txt [utf-8] Mon May 17
> 14:35:51 2010
> @@ -1206,6 +1206,47 @@ Attachment AD: Status report for the Apa
> Attachment AE: Status report for the Apache Subversion Project
> +** Board Issues
> +The Subversion project has no Board-level issues at this time.
> +** Community
> +We have seen some patches and interest from new people on the list,
> +and are paying close attention to them, so they will feel welcome and
> +hopefully join the community.
> +** Releases
> +Since we last reported (March), Subversion made a 1.6.11 release under
> +its old header/licensing regime (continuing on the 1.5.x and 1.6.x
> +branches; 1.7.0 will be the first ASF release). We are hoping for 1.7
> +to occur late this summer, and the development community continues to
> +work on that release.
> +We are planning to put all prior releases (back to 1.0 and possibly
> +earlier) onto archive.apache.org for historical preservation. Some of
> +the historical (signed) tarballs include LGPL dependent elements, so
> +we will carefully label these (we cannot remove them without
> +destroying the original signatures). More recent releases separate the
> +dependencies, and we will simply omit those (they are optional). The
> +1.7 series will use the standard distribution and mirroring framework
> +since they are true ASF releases.
> +** Other
> +The issue tracker continues to remain offsite, as nobody is in any
> +great rush to tackle that project (nor is there a specific known
> +requirement for that to happen; just a desire of the project).
> +The March Subversion event in NYC went well, producing a suggested
> +roadmap that has been well-received and signed-off by the community.
> +The Berlin Subversion event is on-track for the 10th through the 13th,
> +and an "Apache dinner" will also be held during that time.
> +We acquired one GSoC student who will improve the diff format
> +generation to support additional options.
> Attachment AF: Status report for the Apache Tcl Project
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2010-05-17 17:12:13 CEST