[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: in-database properties

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2010 06:17:33 -0500

On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:

> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 05:03:00AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > After my recent rounds of work, it now appears that we're "ready" to
> > move to in-database properties.
> >
> > If you weren't aware, we record properties into the old-style files
> > *and* into the database. There is a TEST_DB_PROPS define in wc/props.c
> > that will test/assert that these properties are in lock-step each time
> > we try to read properties. Except for a couple probably-minor failures
> > in upgrade_tests, the entire test suite now passes when this define is
> > set.
>
> yayayayay!
>
+1

This is a big step, and it looks as if a number of other issues have been
fixed along the way. Any idea what the immediate performance benefits are?

-Hyrum
Received on 2010-05-11 13:18:09 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.