[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: HTTPv2 comparison testing

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 00:48:26 -0400

More testing:

Merges are painful operations today performance-wise, and flex both the
update-style editors and parallel file fetching connections. So checkout
revision 1 from my remote repository of 100 revisions. Take the cumulative
time required to merge r1:10, r10:20, r20:30, r30:40, and r40:50 into that
working copy.

Here are the results:

SERF V2 SERF V1
42.02 50.05
45.02 50.04
45.05 49.02
43.01 50.02
43.78 49.78 87.93%
                
NEON V2 NEON V1
90.03 109.03
90.08 100.08
87.04 92.03
87.02 93.02
88.54 98.54 89.85%

Looks like we see pretty similar improvements across Neon and Serf, HTTPv2
merges taking roughly 90% of the time that they would with v1.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2010-05-07 06:49:06 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.