Re: svn commit: r937276 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:49:27 -0400

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:25, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:04:37PM -0000, gstein_at_apache.org wrote:
>> Author: gstein
>> Date: Fri Apr 23 13:04:37 2010
>> New Revision: 937276
>
>> This breaks schedule_tests 7, to be fixed in a larger and distinct
>> semantic change/revision.
>
> Why not mark it XFAIL in the meantime?

Cuz I planned to fix it in short order. Thus, churning the test script
would be just that... churn.

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2010-04-23 19:49:56 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Greg Stein: "Re: [PATCH] Don't use entries for checking status in svn_wc_status3_t. Was: Re: [WIP] Some quirky parts of libsvn_wc/status.c:assemble_status() for retrieving revisions"
Previous message: Greg Stein: "Re: svn commit: r937421 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/copy.c"
In reply to: Stefan Sperling: "Re: svn commit: r937276 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]