[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.6.11 tarballs up for testing/signing

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:34:48 -0400

Paul Burba wrote:
>> But maybe I'm putting too much stock into what those headers are actually
>> saying about the real work going on underneath.
> You are, that is what I was attempting to explain in my novella
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-04/0435.shtml ;-)


> As to Stefan's failure, his --dry-run notification order was B-mu-D,
> rather than mu-D-B. But all three are on the same depth within the
> target, so IIUC, there is no guarantee in the order in which they will
> be notified right?

That's correct. Thanks for the explanation.

C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2010-04-19 18:35:24 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.