[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Status of 1.6.11

From: Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 20:17:03 -0400

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
<hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> I've merged the latest swig-rb fixes to 1.6.x, rerun 'make check', as well
> as all the binding tests, and everything looks good to me.  As I recall,
> there were a few Windows failures in 1.6.10, so in my paranoia, I'd request
> folks that encountered those to place rerun the tests and verify that they
> have been fixed.  Assuming I don't get any reports of failures or error,
> I'll role the 1.6.11 tarballs tomorrow morning sometime (CDT).
>
> Cheers,
> -Hyrum

Hyrum,

I just finished running,

  [fsfs] x [ra_serf]
  [bdb] x [ra_local]
  JavaHL binding tests
  Ruby binding tests

with 1.6.x_at_934098 on Windows, and everything passes.

Paul
Received on 2010-04-15 02:17:27 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.