On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:19, <julianfoad_at_apache.org> wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/questions.c Wed Apr 14 15:19:13 2010
> @@ -85,6 +85,11 @@
> * if verify_checksum is TRUE. If checksum does not match, return the error
> * SVN_ERR_WC_CORRUPT_TEXT_BASE.
> *
> + * If COMPARE_TEXTBASES is true, translate VERSIONED_FILE_ABSPATH to
> + * repository-normal form and compare the result with PRISTINE_STREAM; if
> + * false, translate PRISTINE_STREAM to working-copy form and compare the
> + * result with VERSIONED_FILE_ABSPATH.
This sounds like it is doing exactly the same thing, just in different
directions.
Unless you realize that line endings are *repaired* on the
detranslate. Thus, it is comparing contents based on a
repo-normal/repaired basis, OR it is comparing an expanded pristine
against a potentially-line-ending-inconsistent working file.
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc.h Wed Apr 14 15:19:13 2010
> @@ -488,7 +488,13 @@ svn_wc__internal_conflicted_p(svn_boolea
>
>
> /* Similar to svn_wc__versioned_file_modcheck(), but with a wc_db parameter
> - * instead of a wc_context. */
> + * instead of a wc_context.
> + *
> + * If COMPARE_TEXTBASES is true, translate VERSIONED_FILE_ABSPATH to
> + * repository-normal form and compare the result with BASE_FILE_ABSPATH; if
> + * false, translate BASE_FILE_ABSPATH to working-copy form and compare the
> + * result with VERSIONED_FILE_ABSPATH.
Likewise, of course.
Cheers,
-g
Received on 2010-04-14 18:03:10 CEST