[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r933251 - /subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:00:01 -0500

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 9:19 AM, <kameshj_at_apache.org> wrote:

> Author: kameshj
> Date: Mon Apr 12 14:19:23 2010
> New Revision: 933251
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=933251&view=rev
> Log:
> *STATUS: Propose r933194 for backport.
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS?rev=933251&r1=933250&r2=933251&view=diff
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS (original)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS Mon Apr 12 14:19:23 2010
> @@ -130,6 +130,12 @@ Candidate changes:
> Fixes ruby binding tests on a couple of platforms. Needed for
> release.
> Votes:
>
> + * r933194
> + Fix for issue 2753
> + SVNListParentPath feature doesn't work when svn authz is used.
> + Justification:
> + This issue is waiting for resolution for more than 3 years.
>

"It's an old issue" doesn't seem like much of a justification to me. Is
there a compelling reason to include this fix in 1.6.x? If so, *that*
should be the justification for the backport.

-Hyrum
Received on 2010-04-13 17:00:33 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.