Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:13:56AM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 22:55, Tim Starling <tstarling_at_wikimedia.org> wrote:
> > > C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > >> We need to find a way to embrace and
> > >> empower would-be Subversion contributors.
> > >
> > > You could start by replying to their mailing list posts. Just a thought.
> Tim, could you provide a link to whichever post(s) you had in mind?
> The lists have lots of traffic, and not everyone reads every post.
> It's possible that your posts were simply overlooked or arrived at
> a time where none of those reading your posts were able to reply.
I read Tim's comment as a general observation, and it strikes a chord
I tend to leave in my mailbox the messages that might turn out to be of
some interest to me. Occasionally I'll look back at the ones that
received no reply and post a follow-up or ping if nobody else has, but
all too often I don't. Here are the most recent ones still sitting in
Syncro SVN Client support
Subversion 1.6.9: update and status
fails on versioned obstruction.
02/04/10 23:52:52 (Sat, 03 Apr 2010
Tobias Bading <tbading_at_web.de>
Bug: Properties are lost in merges
27/03/10 14:11:13 (Sat, 27 Mar 2010
Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com>
segfault in 1.6.9 when updating
02/02/10 18:36:15 (Tue, 02 Feb 2010
(No archive links - too much hassle.)
There were probably also some unanswered messages on subjects that I
don't even try to monitor, which I will have just deleted.
So I guess I could help by posting pings when I see this. Of course we
encourage original posters to follow up their own messages, but that
doesn't mean we shouldn't try to follow up too.
Received on 2010-04-09 15:41:40 CEST