[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] v4 Fix svnversion message as follow-up to r922176

From: Daniel Näslund <daniel_at_longitudo.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 11:06:32 +0200

We're running out of patch versions here ...

gstein pointed out that I should use SVN_IS_VALID_REVNUM(). Fixed!

On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:59:15AM +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> Mispelled Uncommitted with one 't'. This patch corrects that.
>
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:36:53AM +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:04:13PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 10:14:42PM +0200, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > > > Ping! This patch has not been reviewed!
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 09:38:15PM +0100, Daniel Näslund wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > The 1.6 svnversion message was "'path' not versioned, and not exported".
> > > > > But on trunk more than one message has been changed. My first thought
> > > > > was that we should be backward compat in our output but if changes of
> > > > > those messages are ok I'm supplying one.
> > > > >
> > > > > In case we will use new messages, the help text must be updated. It
> > > > > talks of 'exported' but those are not used in the new messages.
> > > > >
> > > > > [[[
> > > > > After the changes in r922176, versioned but not yet committed files were
> > > > > not properly detected. Fixed now!
> > > > >
> > > > > * subversion/svnversion/main.c
> > > > > (main): Check for invalid rev nr for files and dirs.
> > > > >
> > > > > * subversion/tests/cmdline/svnversion_tests.py
> > > > > (structural_changes): New.
> > > > > (tests_list): Add new test.
> > > > > ]]]

Received on 2010-04-02 11:07:24 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.