Vetoing latest issue #3020 fix in 1.6.10
From: Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:05:19 -0400
Mike and I were discussing the changes I made in
The fix in r927243 addressed the problem of mergeinfo in a partial
We dump -r(X>1):Y from repos A then load that dump into repos B. If
svnadmin dump reposA -r200:300 > A.200.300.partial.dump
because those revisions don't refer to valid history re the
Unfortunately this fix breaks a (likely much more) common use case:
svnadmin dump reposA -r0:100 > A.0.100.dump
svnadmin load reposB < A.0.100.dump
In this case, valid mergeinfo may be filtered from the 2nd and or 3rd load.
I'll work on a fix that can handle both use cases, but for now I am
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.