Re: allowing multiple conflicts in storage (Re: svn commit: r928806 - /subversion/trunk/notes/wc-ng/conflict-storage)

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:39:20 +0200

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:04:55PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Actually, I think this becomes much cleaner once we recognize
> that what's right now stored in COMMON is actually operation-specific.

I've committed this in r929504.

We can still move the OPERATION skels around, depending on how
we end up wanting the storage layer to behave wrt operations.

Stefan
Received on 2010-03-31 14:39:54 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Foad: "Re: allowing multiple conflicts in storage"
Previous message: Julian Foad: "Re: redundant path functions"
In reply to: Stefan Sperling: "Re: allowing multiple conflicts in storage (Re: svn commit: r928806 - /subversion/trunk/notes/wc-ng/conflict-storage)"
Next in thread: Bert Huijben: "RE: allowing multiple conflicts in storage (Re: svn commit: r928806 - /subversion/trunk/notes/wc-ng/conflict-storage)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]