[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: description of Peg Revision Algorithm is incomplete

From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent-svn_at_vinc17.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:40:44 +0200

On 2010-03-30 12:12:59 -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Interactions in the working copy with the path some/file.c only make sense
> if there is actually such a path in the working copy. If some/file.c is
> deleted in r51, then either it isn't in your working copy (because you've
> updated past r50) or it is, at r50 or earlier. If it is, you run 'svn cat
> some/file.c' as usual. If it isn't, then the path 'some/file.c' has no
> meaning anyway, so it falls to you to spelunk history and tell Subversion
> more precisely what object you're talking about.

I want a simple way to say: consider the current directory at r50
(walking back through the history) and the object some/file.c in
it at the same revision.

Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
Received on 2010-03-30 20:41:13 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.