Re: useful extra check in FS fold_change function

C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> David Glasser wrote:
>>> Is the attached patch what you had in mind? (Plus similar logic for FSFS,
>>> of course.)
>> Ah, yes, that's what I meant; that patch looks great, assuming it
>> works :)
>
> I'll try to polish this up, add the FSFS flavor, and add a regression test
> when I get some time. Thanks for the report and suggested fix.

Committed in r926151 and r926167. I don't feel particularly compelled to
backport the changes as the higher-level FS stuffs *should* prevent this
scenario from ever occurring anyway. Do you have an opinion one way or the
other, David?

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand