On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 21:23, Joe Swatosh <joe.swatosh_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Philip
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:47 AM, <philip_at_apache.org> wrote:
>>> Author: philip
>>> Date: Wed Mar 10 16:47:27 2010
>>> New Revision: 921445
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921445&view=rev
>>> Remove some access batons from post-commit processing.
>> Since this patch the Ruby bindings test has been failing on the Ubuntu
>> build bot (and locally for me). I haven't looked at the patch closely
>> so I'm not sure what's up, but the relevant part of the test is:
>> Svn::Wc::AdmAccess.open(nil, @wc_path, true, 5) do |access|
>> assert_raises(Svn::Error::WcPathFound) do
>> access.mark_missing_deleted(path1) ### This line raises
>> Svn::Wc::WcPathFound ###
>> access.maybe_set_repos_root(path2, @repos_uri)
>> Judging by the name of the function, it appears to me that the test is
>> I double checked, the rm is removing the file before the call. Could
>> you check this please, or suggest how the test should be modified?
> The problem is that svn_wc__temp_mark_missing_not_present() now does a
> call to read_info(), whereas before it simply checked the disk. The
> function is verifying more state before progressing. In particular,
> you must have a directory that is scheduled for deletion before
> calling that function. Does your test properly set that up?
Here is the current doc string for svn_wc_mark_missing_deleted:
/** Mark missing @a path as 'deleted' in its @a parent's list of entries.
* Return #SVN_ERR_WC_PATH_FOUND if @a path isn't actually missing.
* @deprecated Provided for backward compatibility with the 1.6 API.
I want to make sure I'm understanding correctly. It sounds like I need to
svn del 'path's parent' before calling svn_wc_mark_missing_deleted on 'path.'
Did I follow? If so, then no the test doesn't set that up.
Received on 2010-03-11 07:06:55 CET