On Sun, 2010-03-07, rhuijben_at_apache.org wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Sun Mar 7 16:10:25 2010
> New Revision: 920023
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=920023&view=rev
> Prepare the update editor for more direct WC-DB usage by making it use
> repository relative paths for its calculations.
I reviewed all of this change and it looks good. Just one question...
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c
> (edit_baton): Rename variable.
> (dir_baton): Rename variable.
> (node_get_url_ignore_errors): Rename to ...
> (node_get_relpath_ignore_errors): ... this and use some wc_db apis
> instead of svn_wc__node helpers.
> (make_dir_baton): Calculate relative path instead of full uri.
> (file_baton): Rename variable.
> (make_file_baton): Calculate relative path instead of full uri.
> (open_root): Fetch full uri for entry operation.
> (check_tree_conflict): Take relative path instead of url.
> (do_entry_deletion): Accept relative path and calculate full url
> if re-adding a node via its entry.
> (delete_entry): Construct relative path.
> (add_directory, open_directory, add_file,
> open_file): Create full urls for error messages and update calls
> to functions that changed to relative paths.
> (loggy_tweak_base_node): Add repos_root argument.
> (merge_file): Update caller.
> (close_edit): Construct full url.
> (make_editor): Assert on repository_root and construct switch
> relative path.
> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c?rev=920023&r1=920022&r2=920023&view=diff
> --- subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c (original)
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c Sun Mar 7 16:10:25 2010
> @@ -2887,10 +2913,11 @@
> tmp_entry.revision = *(eb->target_revision);
> - if (eb->switch_url)
> + if (eb->switch_relpath)
> - tmp_entry.url = svn_path_url_add_component2(eb->switch_url,
> - db->name, pool);
> + tmp_entry.url = svn_path_url_add_component2(eb->repos,
> + db->new_relpath,
> + pool);
> modify_flags |= SVN_WC__ENTRY_MODIFY_URL;
Is that definitely the same as the straightforward conversion which
would be to join (eb->repos, eb->switch_relpath, db->name)?
I can't figure out whether the code that generates db->new_relpath (in
make_dir_baton()) will always have the same result. I'm trying it out
by constructing both and comparing them with an assertion, but I can't
be sure that all the switch scenarios actually get tested in the test
On the other hand, maybe the new "join(repos, new_relpath)" is more
correct than what was there before.
Received on 2010-03-10 13:32:34 CET