[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

revision_status

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 03:29:22 -0500

Hey Daniel,

I saw on IRC that you were looking into revision_status. I posted some
comment about that, but then your session timed out. Figured it would
be best to copy that here, for both you and others.

gstein: dannas: re: revision_status ... I think that can be
(re)written from scratch in a much more efficient manner. it should
*not* be using an editor whatsoever.
gstein: dannas: as an experiment a while back, I rewrote it using a
simple recursive function,
gstein: today, it creates an editor and then immediately closes it.
that causes the editor's close function to begin a *walk* over the
affected area. fucking stupid. why create an editor in the first
place? just do the damned walk.
gstein: so if you want to fix it, then ignore the whole editor usage.
code up an explicit walk.
gstein: in fact, we may have some better walk functions now (look in
node.c) that are tuned to wc.db
gstein: hard to say.

Cheers,
-g
Received on 2010-03-08 09:29:59 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.