[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Peg revision question

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 13:57:49 -0500

On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:55 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> It's not a new "line of history" of any sense that we typically sling that
> phrase.

I guess I was thinking that even though this was moved, internally it
was a copy + delete. So what if it had just been a copy only? We
would never expect the history from the origin to follow into the copy
in that scenario (as opposed to just staying in the origin). So I at
least think it is a related but new line of history from the point of
copy? 

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Received on 2010-03-05 19:58:22 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.