[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r915378 - in /subversion/trunk: notes/wc-ng/transitions subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-queries.sql subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:22:07 +0000

"Bert Huijben" <bert_at_qqmail.nl> writes:

>> I want both the base and the working presence, the base presence comes
>> from base_get_info but I couldn't see how to reliably distinguish
>> working presence from base presence when using _read_info. I get
>> SVN_ERR_WC_PATH_NOT_FOUND for no base and no working, and
>> base_shadowed TRUE for base and working, but it was not clear how to
>> distinguish base and no working from no base and working.
> Greg?
> I think the idea was that you always should be able to tell the difference
> from the status?
> Deleting incomplete, excluded or absent should be a user error.

Deleting incomplete should be a user error?

If I have BASE normal and no WORKING I can delete it, but then a
subsequent update can make BASE incomplete. We have to support that
as far as I can see. If we do support it then BASE incomplete and
WORKING base-deleted is a valid state, so why not allow the delete to
make the transition to that state?

Received on 2010-02-24 14:22:51 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.