[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Is sqlite fast enough?

From: Matthew Bentham <mjb67_at_artvps.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:42:53 +0000

On 22/02/2010 11:13, Philip Martin wrote:
> Matthew Bentham<mjb67_at_artvps.com> writes:
>
>> For me on CYGWIN_NT-6.0-WOW64 brahe 1.7.1(0.218/5/3) 2009-12-07 11:48
>> i686 Cygwin
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
>> $ svn --version
>> svn, version 1.6.9 (r901367)
>>
>> Create the test repo using the shell script, repeat "$ time svn
>> status" a few times:
>> real 0m37.303s
>> real 0m15.754s
>> real 0m15.832s
>
> I know Subversion is slow on Windows but that is extreme, it's about
> the same as my Linux machine when the cache is cold and it has to wait
> for real disk IO; once in memory its an order of magnitude faster. I
> suspect the cygwin layer might be contributing to that (15 seconds of
> CPU). Would it be possible for you to try "svn status" with a
> non-cygwin client?
>

Sure:

/cygdrive/c/Program\ Files\ \(x86\)/CollabNet\ Subversion/svn.exe --version
svn, version 1.6.5 (r38866)
    compiled Aug 21 2009, 21:38:11

time /cygdrive/c/Program\ Files\ \(x86\)/CollabNet\ Subversion/svn.exe
status

real 0m8.569s
real 0m8.599s
real 0m8.611s

Quite a bit faster :-) Not as fast as your 1.1s on Debian though :-(
The machine is a 2.5Ghz Core2 Quad running Vista 64.

Matthew
Received on 2010-02-22 12:43:30 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.