On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Maciej (Matchek) Blizinski
<blizinski_at_google.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 6:25 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> Committed (with tweaks) in r911893. Thanks
>
> About the tweaks -- I can see that it's a custom to point at a
> specific person maintaining specific set of packages. In my patch, I
> pointed at a page specific to the package; this page always lists the
> current maintainer. Our packages are built from a common source code
> repository, and it's not unheard of maintainers taking over each
> other's packages. The package will be always distributed by OpenCSW,
> but the specific maintainer may change in the future.
>
> In this case, I'll add it to the package documentation that when
> somebody takes over the package, they need to update subversion's page
> as well.
I think it's fine to just say "OpenCSW team" (or whatever moniker you
prefer) as the maintainer and provide the general list contact to the
OpenCSW team. I don't think it matters who the individual is as long
as someone on the OpenCSW team (via whatever preferred mechanisms you
have) is able to answer questions if a user has issues with the
package.
Thanks! -- justin
Received on 2010-02-20 17:14:09 CET