Re: Is sqlite fast enough?
Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote on 02/18/2010 03:31:19 PM:
> Awesome work! We've just been assuming/hoping it would be fast enough,
> and would resolve any problems "later". It is good to see we're in the
> right ballpark.
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 13:21, Philip Martin <philip.
> martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> > How fast are sqlite queries be compared to the old-wc entry caching?
> > Operations like update benefit from faster locking, but in old-wc
> > status does no locking at all. Also the multiple entries files give
> > the data a tree-like organisation that is not modelled quite so well
> > by an SQL table. Is sqlite going to be at least as fast as old-wc at
> > running status when the OS cache is hot? I've been vaguely assumming
> > that it would be OK but this week I felt it was time to investigate.
> > What would we do in 3 months time if wc-ng turns out to be an order of
> > magnitude slower than old-wc?
What platform were these test executed on? We need to make sure
windows platforms are just as zippy.
Received on 2010-02-18 22:58:44 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev