[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] Comments on wc-metadata.sql PRISTINE and

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:57:36 -0500

Also: PRISTINE.size is the size on-disk, which may be different from
the uncompressed size.

The on-disk size is handier than the uncompressed size, I believe.

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 13:51, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> WORKING_NODE rows exist for *all* affected nodes.
> ACTUAL_NODE rows may exist w/o a corresponding WORKING_NODE row (in
> which case, there better be a BASE_NODE row).
> In the comments, we should be better about stating null rather than
> NULL (as the latter indicates a NULL pointer, not the SQL null value).
> moved_here is 1 or something else. There is no need to have a tri-state.
> Your comment with respect to moved_to is incomplete. There are more
> possible states than just 'base-deleted' and 'normal'. You could also
> have (at least) 'not-present' on a child. Consider the sequence: MOVE
> A to B. COPY C to A. DELETE A/D. The A/D child will be not-present.
> Cheers,
> -g
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 13:38, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>> Hey WC-NG folks, please tell me what's right/wrong/unsure in the
>> additions and changes below. Feel free to commit any parts that are
>> right: I'm not yet familiar enough to really be comfortable committing
>> it myself but I will if you want.
>> - Julian
Received on 2010-02-17 19:58:09 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.