[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r910298 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/swig: include/svn_types.swg ruby/svn/wc.rb ruby/test/test_wc.rb

From: Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:39:01 +0000

On Feb 15, 2010, at 9:44 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:

> Hi Hyrum,
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
> <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>> Joe,
>> Great to see this work happening. Be aware that some of the APIs are still moving targets, so some things might break.
>> -Hyrum
> With you mentioning elsewhere that a branch could happen as early as
> May, I figured I better get started. Understanding that there are no
> guarantees, would you please point me at the most stable of the 1.7
> moving targets? :-) Or perhaps I should just table until you give me
> a high sign?

Anything with the double underscore (e.g., svn_wc__node_foo()) is considered private, and shouldn't be wrapped, but I presume you knew that. Some of those APIs may be publicized in the future, others may not. Anything which is "New in 1.7" could change, but we've been pretty conservative about what we've put in the public header thus far, so it's more likely that the API surface will grow, rather than existing APIs change. We still reserve that right, though.

The May date is my optimistic if-everybody-pitches-in-and-helps estimate. Please don't read anything more into it than that. :)

> Any hope of getting the Ubuntu buildbot going again?


I've actually been trying to get into the box since Friday. I think something took it down, but due to the long holiday weekend in the US, nobody has been in to fix it. If nothing has happens by this evening, I'll ping the parties responsible. Sorry for the delay.

Received on 2010-02-16 11:39:44 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.