Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:37 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>> Dongsheng Song wrote:
>>> 1. website format
>>> I suggest use xml format, we can select docbook website like NetBSD, or
>>> custom xml format like httpd.
>> We already decided against fussing with generated websites.
> FWIW, generally speaking, ASF infra isn't a huge fan of mod_include or
> other dynamic techniques. It's probably fine now as there is likely
> enough excess capacity...but there's a reason why the ASF only served
> purely static content for a looooong time. =) -- justin
I'm really allergic to most kinds of write-XML-and-generate-HTML
confusions, including mod_include ;the reason being that when I modify a
page, I want to be able to "test" it without having to fire up a local
web server or some other extra process. At least mod_include keeps the
source in HTML, and if capacty ever becomes an issue, it's pretty much
trivial to generate static pages from mod-included ones.
CMS rules but only for much more complex sites, and of course that burns
capacity even faster...
Received on 2010-02-07 21:44:27 CET