On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:00 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>> No, it wasn't linked anywhere on the sidebar. It wasn't even
>> mentioned on the top-half of the "Getting Involved" - the only link I
>> found is in the second-to-last bullet point of that page. In my
>> school of web design, that is a very hidden link. So, it must mean
>> that the content is very un-important to us. I feel that the content
>> is much more important and deserves a more prominent shout-out.
> For the record, I agree that the "Getting Involved" page should make much,
> much more reference to the HACKING document. What's there is just a first
> draft, really, whipped up by Mark and myself to get something in place.
> Many of the points need to be fleshed out a bit with specific details and
> references to "the way we do things 'round here".
Sure. But, yet, I don't grok the opposition to adding a link until
the HACKING document is split up and fully integrated with the
"Getting Involved" page? It's not like we can't replace the HACKING
link (or whatever term you feel more comfortable with) when we get
around to doing something better on the "Getting Involved" page.
As we constantly say around here, the perfect should not be the enemy
of the good. =) -- justin
Received on 2010-02-03 17:27:38 CET