Re: TODO: Python bindings re-license

From: Mark Phippard <markphip_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:28:17 -0500

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 4:22 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:

>> I missed that, but I would agree. 狢 do not think we should have
>> anything but LICENSE and NOTICE.

This appears to be the proper way to handle it within the files that
are licensed differently themselves:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk/strings/apr_strings.c

Poking around APR and HTTPD I think I confirmed that they just have
the top-level LICENSE and NOTICE files. And other than license within
source file header, as shown above, they do not include any other
license files.

-- 
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/

Received on 2010-01-29 22:28:54 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: C. Michael Pilato: "Re: TODO: Python bindings re-license"
Previous message: Mark Phippard: "Re: TODO: Python bindings re-license"
Maybe in reply to: C. Michael Pilato: "TODO: Python bindings re-license"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]