[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: '@BASE' vs. 'BASE tree' -- was: Re: svn_wc__db_base_get_info() vs. svn_wc__db_read_info() ?

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:52:21 -0500

I didn't see it as "mouthing off" :-)

I would also suggest new names for the trees since WORKING has caused us
problems, too.

PRISTINE might be okay. And something to reference a restructured tree
(WORKING is all about add/copy/move/del).

On Jan 28, 2010 9:57 AM, "Julian Foad" <julianfoad_at_btopenworld.com> wrote:

... and if that sounded like me just mouthing off against lack of clear
docco, but not helping again, sorry but I'd really like to help.

- Julian

On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 14:51 +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Neels J...
Received on 2010-01-28 17:52:55 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.