Re: JavaHL package name? (was: Discussion: graduating Subversion)

On Jan 26, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Martin Furter wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
>> My take is deprecate the old package names (org.tigris.*), add the new
>> package name (org.apache.subversion.*), and remove the deprecated
>> names whenever we go to 2.0.
>>
>> I'm moderately ambivalent on whether this happens for 1.7 or if can
>> wait for 1.8...
>>
>> I don't see much else we can do under our versioning policies. -- justin
>
> How about transforming all classes in org.tigris.subversion to wrappers around org.apache.subversion classes and replace the interfaces with empty ones derived from the apache interfaces (plus their current parent interface)?

I think this is the way to go. I was playing around last night with re-jiggering the java code into the new package(s), and got something reasonable put together. I'll commit it shortly, and I invite folks to comment / criticize.

(I'm especially hoping Mark can take a look, as he probably has more knowledge about Java package organization than I do. And he's one of the primary consumers.)

-Hyrum
Received on 2010-01-27 23:19:04 CET