[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: JavaHL package name? (was: Discussion: graduating Subversion)

From: Роман Донченко <DXDragon_at_yandex.ru>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 23:08:42 +0300

Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> писал в своём письме Tue, 26 Jan 2010
01:32:29 +0300:

> See below...
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 17:32
> Subject: Re: Discussion: graduating Subversion
> To: general_at_incubator.apache.org
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 17:21, Craig L Russell <Craig.Russell_at_sun.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 12:49 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Before calling for a vote to graduate Subversion, I figured it prudent
>>> to have a discussion first. I believe Subversion is quite ready (and
>>> has been, but the holidays and whatnot kept me from sending this
>>> earlier).
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on why Subversion should NOT graduate now?
>>
>> As I've said earlier, I'd like to know how you plan to resolve the
>> question
>> of in which package you propose to ship the Java components. IIUC, you
>> use
>> org.tigris in the distributions to date.
>
> I don't think we have a specific plan for that yet, and I know we were
> looking for "Apache Best Practices" on that, but not sure if we found
> any there.
>
> I'll bring that back to the dev list.

What's in a name? Can't we just leave everything as it is until Subversion
2?

Having a package with a misleading name is undesirable, of course, but
it's a nominal annoyance, as opposed to redoing all the old code that
depends on the bindings (and making it backwards-incompatible in the
process).

Roman.
Received on 2010-01-27 21:10:22 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.