[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Real problem is r88099

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 03:09:32 +0000

Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> writes:

> ==10949== Invalid read of size 8
> ==10949== at 0x5991011: range_contains (mergeinfo.c:780)
> ==10949== by 0x59913F3: rangelist_intersect_or_remove (mergeinfo.c:912)
> ==10949== by 0x5991903: svn_rangelist_intersect (mergeinfo.c:1043)
> ==10949== by 0x4E76FF3: svn_client_mergeinfo_log (mergeinfo.c:2036)
> ==10949== by 0x415BAC: svn_cl__mergeinfo (mergeinfo-cmd.c:120)
> ==10949== by 0x414A11: main (main.c:2234)
> ==10949== Address 0xa7a4c08 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 24 free'd
> ==10949== at 0x4C2130F: free (vg_replace_malloc.c:323)
> ==10949== by 0x5E11469: pool_clear_debug (apr_pools.c:1432)
> ==10949== by 0x5E11537: apr_pool_clear_debug (apr_pools.c:1469)
> ==10949== by 0x4E76FD0: svn_client_mergeinfo_log (mergeinfo.c:2035)
> ==10949== by 0x415BAC: svn_cl__mergeinfo (mergeinfo-cmd.c:120)
> ==10949== by 0x414A11: main (main.c:2234)

Fixed in r903535.

-- 
Philip
Received on 2010-01-27 04:10:13 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.