On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Senthil Kumaran S <senthil_at_collab.net> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:16 AM, <stylesen_at_apache.org> wrote:
>>> Author: stylesen
>>> Date: Fri Dec 18 09:16:18 2009
>>> New Revision: 892189
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892189&view=rev
>>> Merge r891672 from ^/subversion/trunk.
>>> Modify subversion/tests/cmdline/externals_tests.py to correct some
>>> latest changes on this test in trunk (r876917).
>> What client version of svn did you perform this merge with? I'm
>> curious as to why that no mergeinfo was recorded. Did you
>> --ignore-ancestry? Or revert the svn:mergeinfo property changes? Or
>> just not commit them? Or something else?Paul
> I used latest development version of subversion to perform this merge. It
> should be the latest trunk revision of subversion source as on Dec 18, 2010.
> No, I did not do an --ignore-ancestry or edited the svn:mergeinfo property.
Hmmm. I just built trunk_at_892188 (the latest version of trunk on
12/18/2009 prior to this commit). I redid this merge and mergeinfo
was set as expected:
C:\SVN\src-branch-1.6.x-r891672>svn --version -q
Repository Root: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
Repository UUID: 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
Node Kind: directory
Last Changed Author: stylesen
Last Changed Rev: 891677
Last Changed Date: 2009-12-17 07:47:52 -0500 (Thu, 17 Dec 2009)
C:\SVN\src-branch-1.6.x-r891672>svn merge ^^/subversion/trunk -c891672
--- Merging r891672 into '.':
C:\SVN\src-branch-1.6.x-r891672>svn diff --depth empty
Property changes on: .
Did you commit from some directory below the root of the branch or use
some GUI that allowed you to deselect the mergeinfo change? I'm just
trying to figure out if you've come across some diabolical bug or if
this is just pilot error.
P.S. I redid this merge using --record-only and committed the change
in r903466. I did this for two reasons:
1) So the correct mergeinfo is set.
2) To see what impact it has on the problem Julian reported here:
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-01/0606.shtml and I speculated
might be related to the lack of mergeinfo from this merge.
Received on 2010-01-26 23:48:54 CET