Re: Hashtable data freed before pool cleanup
On 1/7/2010 6:06 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 16:26 +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> This sounds like a valid point.
>> I would propose to revert r817810 / r817809 (for 1.3.x / 1.4.x) and
>> only keep r817806 (trunk). Graham?
>> IMHO we can backport this again later if the problem is sorted out in
> I think we should revert this even in trunk for now, because it
> completely changes how hashes work. A hash allocated from a pool must
> keep things in valid memory until all cleanups finish running for that
+1... it will make porters lives a pain moving to 2.0, and possibly lead
them down the wrong path in developing against 2.0 but deploying against
a stable 1.x release.
Received on 2010-01-19 15:37:09 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev