On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:19:27AM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>> > As a result of the various problems surrounding 1.6.7, we're pulling the release, and will re-roll as 1.6.8. The only blocker for rolling is the r896522, r896547 which addresses a regression found in the 1.6.7 tarball (and uncovered by the ruby bindings). As soon as this fix is backported, I'll roll 1.6.8.
>> >
>> > In the meantime, please revert the r896522, r896547 group, as well as any other items which should be included in 1.6.8.
>>
>> That should be *review the r896522, r896547 group*, not "revert".
>
> I'll commit my +1 in a minute.
>
> Note that Paul added a new file resolve_tests.py to 1.6.x which has
> an Apache 2.0 license header. Should the license header be changed
> for backport?
No, we already distribute files with different licenses (even no
license) in them so I do not see where it would matter.
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Received on 2010-01-08 16:42:41 CET