[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] mtime functional specification notes

From: Ed <ed_at_kdtc.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:25:38 +0800

Julian Foad wrote:
>> Minor aesthetic change, but one I do agree. One concern I also
>> had was "am I complicating matters more by introducing so many
>> different mtimes?"
>
> I'm not 100% clear what those properties are for, but I'm pretty sure
> you are complicating matters too much by suggesting them.

Judging from the response to my rfc, I probably made
a mistake in posting it without considerable forethought.
At that point in time, I thought that it would be more
'informative' were we to include the different properties
to allow users to look up when the file/directory was
added (imported, committed, merged, etc). Given your
comment, I suppose the required work (as implied by the
  RFC) is probably far less effective/efficient in
dev time usage.

>
> I think Philip's example was assuming that 'foo' was a versioned file
> that was checked out, and this step is modifying its mtime but not its
> content, and wondering what status that would show and what would happen
> at commit time.

My bad. I had misunderstood his post.

Edmund
Received on 2010-01-06 09:44:09 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.