[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Subversion in 2010

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 18:30:31 +0000

On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 01:17:51PM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Mark Mielke <mark_at_mark.mielke.cc> wrote:
> > Another related area of limitation here is the "reintegrate". This seems
> > fundamentally broken to me. That the branch needs to be removed and
> > re-created in order to "reintegrate" again indicates a flaw in the design.
>
> The branch does not have to be deleted, that is just the simplest
> thing to recommend. You can use --record-only to record the
> reintegrate merge on the branch and then just continue. I've seen
> this answered and explained dozens of times so I will not go into any
> more detail.

See here, for example:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-users/200912.mbox/%3C20091220185906.GA18517@noel.stsp.name%3E

Stefan
Received on 2010-01-04 19:31:14 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.