Do you have the ability to test this on 1.6.6?
-Hyrum
On Dec 22, 2009, at 2:31 AM, Nicolas Dumazet wrote:
> Hello folks!
>
> I encountered that nice baby today:
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> svn_wc_remove_from_revision_control (adm_access=0x96a2a98, name=0xb7f6c9cb "",
> destroy_wf=0, instant_error=0, cancel_func=0x8053640
> <svn_cl__check_cancel>,
> cancel_baton=0x0, pool=0x96a69d0) at subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_ops.c:2634
> 2634 if (dir_entry->depth != svn_depth_exclude)
> (gdb) bt
> #0 svn_wc_remove_from_revision_control (adm_access=0x96a2a98,
> name=0xb7f6c9cb "",
> destroy_wf=0, instant_error=0, cancel_func=0x8053640
> <svn_cl__check_cancel>,
> cancel_baton=0x0, pool=0x96a69d0) at subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_ops.c:2634
> #1 0xb7f34631 in svn_wc_delete3 (path=0x969d698
> "unit_definition_interaction_workflow",
> adm_access=0x96a6a18, cancel_func=0x8053640 <svn_cl__check_cancel>,
> cancel_baton=0x0, notify_func=0x8056ff0 <notify>, notify_baton=0x969d6c0,
> keep_local=1, pool=0x96a69d0) at subversion/libsvn_wc/adm_ops.c:1220
> #2 0xb7f8ea3c in svn_client__wc_delete (
> path=0x969d698 "unit_definition_interaction_workflow",
> adm_access=0x96a6a18,
> force=0, dry_run=0, keep_local=1, notify_func=0x8056ff0 <notify>,
> notify_baton=0x969d6c0, ctx=0x9688e40, pool=0x96a69d0)
> at subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c:231
> #3 0xb7f8eb85 in svn_client_delete3 (commit_info_p=0xbff523b0,
> paths=0x969d4d0,
> force=0, keep_local=1, revprop_table=0x0, ctx=0x9688e40, pool=0x9688610)
> at subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c:277
> #4 0x0804f014 in svn_cl__delete (os=0x96887b8, baton=0xbff525c4,
> pool=0x9688610)
> at subversion/svn/delete-cmd.c:75
>
> It appears in the context of a locked repository, when cleaning up
> locks, and then removing an added but not yet committed directory.
> (Mandriva 2009.1)
>
> Is it something old/already fixed? I see a bunch of hits about issues
> in 1.6.2, but I'm not sure about that one.
>
>
> I was not able to backtrack enough to include steps to create a
> locked/buggy repo, I'm attaching a small part of my repo, that
> hopefully should be enough to reproduce the issue:
>
> tar -xvzf segfault.tgz
> cd foo/unit_definition_interaction_workflow
> svn cleanup .
> cd ..
> svn cleanup .
> svn rm --keep-local unit_definition_interaction_workflow # shabam
>
>
>
> Please let me know if I can help more.
> Please CC me as I'm not a subscriber here.
>
> Thanks :)
>
> --
> Nicolas Dumazet — NicDumZ
> <segfault.tgz>
Received on 2009-12-22 18:22:04 CET