[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.6.7 Release Status

From: Edmund <edmund_at_belfordhk.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:26:41 +0800

Jack Repenning wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> Personally, I don't like any of them, and am hoping there is still
>> some way of using Subversion commits to www/. Thoughts?
> Some further details might be of interest:
> We've just completed applying, as a "hot-fix," several of the changes
> that will be coming in the upgrade in January. But not all of them; for
> example, a very relevant change coming in January is upgrade of the
> platform from Linux 2.4 to 2.6, and that can't be done in a 20-minute
> down. We do have one or two sites even larger than Tigris and running on


20 minutes to go from 2.4 to 2.6. No kidding it can't be done. I have
a server here still on 2.4 and am very reluctant in migrating to 2.6
due to the possible downtime to be a day or two minimum (and that is
if nothing drastic happens). I'm not even sure if I can do that. The
unimaginable hairiness of doing a 2.4 to 2.6 gives me the hibby-jibbies.

I think it's easier (IMO) to set up a whole new 2.6 server and migrate
the files there. YMMV, of course. :)

Just my $0.02.

Received on 2009-12-22 05:26:42 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.