On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:47 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
>>> <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Gather up your holiday cheer, for I would like to propose a gift to the Subversion user community: Subversion
>>>> 1.6.7. I know that folks have been busy with the ASF transition as of late, but our users have been busy
>>>> finding bugs and STATUS is getting pretty full. As a result, I'd like to roll 1.6.7 on Wed., Dec. 16.
>>>>
>>> Does being in the incubator add any new wrinkles in publishing a
>>> release? Such as having it reviewed first? Also, the release
>>> obviously does not have any of the license changes in it. Is that a
>>> problem? Out of curiosity, once we are a TLP can we still do a new
>>> 1.6.x or 1.5.x release without the license changes?
>>>
>>
>> I'm not sure about this. I know Greg and Justin have been traveling, but hopefully they can chime in. (I suspect we can still publish the code on s.t.o if it isn't yet acceptable to the ASF.)
>>
>
> 1.6.7 doesn't have all the necessary licensing bits. It wouldn't pass a
> license review. However, IIRC the IPMC wants to review the release process.
That's what I figured. I'm fine with doing the release process on dev_at_s.a.o, and allowing whatever scrutiny the IPMC want into the process.
-Hyrum
Received on 2009-12-08 21:45:04 CET