On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 13:41 +0000, Julian Foad wrote:
> Bhuvaneswaran A wrote:
> > Branko, Julian: Thank you for the review comments.
> >
> > Incorporated the above suggestion and committed in r887178. Now that the
> > script is stable, as discussed in this thread [1], shall I nominate this
> > script to 1.6.x branch?
> > [1]
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2410330
>
> Do we need an up-to-date copy of it in branches/1.6.x - in other words,
> do we want the Hudson system to use the script that it finds in the
> "dev/tools/" directory of the branch it is building? I would have
> thought it should just use the copy that's in trunk, even when it is
> building and testing a branch, because the schedule and purpose of
> maintaining subversion-1.6.x is separate from the schedule and purpose
> of maintaining the testing system.
That's right. Right now we use the script in trunk to generate report
for 1.6.x build. The build script is ugly to execute the script from
relative path. This is not an issue right now, as both builds are tied
to same box. But in case, we tie trunk and 1.6.x build to separate box
we might have to co this script from trunk while we build 1.6.x branch,
solely due to the fact that it does not exist in 1.6.x branch.
That's the reason I prefer to backport this script to 1.6.x branch.
--
Bhuvaneswaran A
CollabNet Software P Ltd. | www.collab.net
Received on 2009-12-04 15:24:00 CET