[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] locate of website content

From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:07:33 -0500

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 23:37, Hyrum K. Wright
<hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>
> On Nov 18, 2009, at 10:05 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Currently, we put our website content into trunk/www/. We can continue
>> to do this at Apache, but I would like to suggest that we put the
>> content at site/ (as a sibling to trunk). "site" is the standard name
>> at Apache, and I don't think that we want/need to branch/tag the
>> website content along with the code.
>>
>> Once we decide on this, then I can file a ticket to construct the website.
>>
>> I'm away for a couple days this weekend, but will file that ticket
>> Sunday night (Eastern time), assuming the discussion isn't wildly
>> divergent.
>
> +1
>
> Standardizing with the Apache world is a good thing, and we don't ship www/ as part of our tarballs, anyway (save hacking.html).

Ah! I thought we were (still?) doing that. Okee doke.

And to clarify: the website location is not standardized, just the
"site" name. We could retain trunk/site/ if that is the consensus.
(well, we could also do trunk/www if we wanted... we *are* the ones in
charge of it)

Anyways. I just wanted to ensure people knew their options.

So far... the consensus is brewing for "move to site/, as a sibling to
trunk". Keep the discussion (or endorsements) flowing...

Cheers,
-g

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2419881
Received on 2009-11-19 06:07:50 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.