On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:05 AM, Dave Brown <dave.brown_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Dave Brown <dave.brown_at_wandisco.com>
>> wrote:
[..]
>>
>> So you're running ra_serf tests then? The master is actually passing a
>> string to the svn-check script specifying which ra layer is used for
>> testing. The scripts don't use these (yet), so we do it the other way
>> around. I make sure the string passed by the master matches with what
>> the slave is checking. This way the waterfall page shows the correct
>> info.
>
> This machine is using ra_neon. I can do neon and/or serf if that fills more
> holes in coverage. But I notice that your OS X machine is doing ra_serf
> already. There are currently no libserf rpm's in the default CentOS
> repositories, and it seems most sensible to mimic what the package
> maintainers for a given platform are likely to use. So I'm assuming CentOS
> will use ra_neon, unless they pull in serf officially when 1.7 comes down.
> There are 3rd party repositories that currently have libserf, or else I can
> just build from source.
>
> -dave
>
>> ..
>>
>>> Lieven, unless you see anything wrong, you can make it fully live at your
>>> leisure.
Flipped the switch in r880873, the CentOS buildbot is now officially
accepted! :)
Thanks!
Lieven
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2418617
Received on 2009-11-16 18:55:20 CET