[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [RFC] which bug tracker to use?

From: Edmund Wong <ed_at_kdtc.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:43:52 +0800

Greg Stein wrote:
> I'll preface this with: the ASF does not *mandate* that we use its
> facilities for bug tracking. It only wants source control and the
> original distribution point to be on ASF hardware. I'm not necessarily
> advocating that we keep a separate tracker (user confusion), but it is
> possible. Weigh the pros/cons in your mind.
>
> The ASF provides two bug trackers:
>
> 1) Jira at http://issues.apache.org/jira/
>
> 2) Bugzilla at http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/

I think the bug tracker that closely resembles the current
issue tracker that Subversion employs would be the best
choice since users have the 'feel' already. That's my
comment.

I've never used Jira; but, I have used Bugzilla but
that was a while back. FWIW, I'm going to say Bugzilla.

So, as they say, +1 for Bugzilla.

Edmund

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2415970
Received on 2009-11-10 01:56:11 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.