I have logged issue #3521
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3521
Gavin.
On 03/11/2009, at 10:18 , Gavin Baumanis wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Although there is a patch submission - there was a quite a bit of
> discussion too.
> Though there doesn't seem to have been an agreement or a subsequent
> patch submission (if at all needed).
> But since it has been a week now without activity I thought I would
> bring it back up the list - in case it had fallen off people's radar.
>
> Gavin.
>
> On 27/10/2009, at 14:55 , Branko Cibej wrote:
>
>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>> On Oct 22, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Bhuvaneswaran A wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> The sum of all >1 seconds test cases sum up to 12.6 minutes.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That does seem rather quick. I just ran 'make check' on a separate
>>> working copy on the same machine, and got something different:
>>> real 32m51.756s
>>> user 6m40.321s
>>> sys 6m27.504s
>>>
>>> I don't know that this is a problem with the junit converter script,
>>> or perhaps the test running reporting bogus ELAPSED times.
>>>
>>
>> Apparently it's quite reasonable. As I posted elsewhere, I got a
>> similar
>> "real" time on my laptop (with tmpfs and cleanups and parallel test
>> executions), but my user time was almost 22 minutes. And I have an
>> elapsed time for commit-tests.py under one minute. While it's easy to
>> imagine this being twice as fast on a real machine with something
>> more
>> than this trundle for a CPU, I can hardly imagine how that would be
>> truncated to 0 seconds.
>>
>> -- Brane
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2411585
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2413974
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2415375
Received on 2009-11-07 10:31:06 CET