[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PROPOSAL][VOTE] Subversion

From: Branko Cibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:18:24 +0100

Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Branko Cibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> wrote:
>
>>> Any thoughts or concerns?
>>>
>> Just one. Once 1.7 is ASF-branded, all is dandy for that version and
>> newer ones. However, we're still bound to support 1.6, and security
>> fixes for 1.5. That means we'll have to rebrand those two branches
>> anyway, won't we? Might as well do that for 1.6.7 then ...
>>
>
> As we discussed at the Meetup last night, changing all of the
> attributions and such would be a bit disruptive for a point release.
> So, I'd prefer that we not rebrand to minimize the delta between 1.6.6
> and 1.6.7 (and for 1.5.x).
>
> My $.02. -- justin
>
Oh, I agree -- otherwise backports will be a royal pain. So hopefully we
won't have to rebrand point releases and security fixes.

-- Brane

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2415206
Received on 2009-11-06 20:18:39 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.